Elon Musk is the richest person in the world with a reported net worth of $359.4 billion[1]. Why does he want to steal our tax dollars? What indication is there that further self-enrichment is his goal?
This is such an insane take I keep hearing. What 10 million wasn’t enough, 100 million wasn’t enough, 100 billion wasn’t enough? But when he hit 359 billion yep that was the number, now he is good.
My pet theory is he's still mad about being forced to buy Twitter after he opened his big stupid high-as-a-kite mouth, and decided to channel his anger into wrecking the organization that, ultimately, was what made him follow through on that deal (the US government).
If you were asking what is Musk's motivation to knock over a corner store then sure, hundreds of billions of dollars argues against. But the US government spent over $6 trillion last year, if Elon ran AmericaX, a "much more efficient" replacement for the United States of America it makes hundreds of billions seem like chicken feed.
But sure, money isn't everything, maybe he's going to destroy some bureaucrats who annoyed him, or who he imagines annoyed him, or who symbolically represent some annoying idea. It doesn't really matter why, American voters apparently weren't even capable of imagining why it might be a bad idea - which isn't great, but the American system of government is especially ill-suited to solving this sort of problem which compounds that.
Elon’s end goal is off-world - maybe not for him, but his grandchildren at least. He and a group of other wealthy folk have the goal of getting their descendants off planet and living elsewhere, and they will do whatever it takes to get there. If humanity on earth has to burn so that they can go somewhere new and fresh and all theirs, they will do it.
Elon sees the rest of us as stepping stones to his long-term goals.
Beyond the basic greed which causes someone to become a billionaire in the first place, his wealth is almost entirely in equities rather than hard assets and the same volatility which made him set wealth records could easily move him back down the list. Most of his companies were substantially boosted by government funding and he has had a number of legal cases where adverse government decisions could significantly impact the share price of his companies. For example, the NTSB forcing Tesla to stop selling FSD under false pretenses or doing a safety recall; or removal of the tariffs keeping BYD out of the U.S. market would lower Tesla share prices which are ¾ of his net worth. SpaceX is most of the rest and that goes up or down based on things like whether NASA hires them or they’re forced to pay for environmental damages.
There are tons of non-obvious concerns: Starlink is in the news with the special FAA contract (part of why they want control of the GSA is that Starlink isn’t on the general Enterprise Infrastructure Solutions contract, making it harder for agencies to buy) but it even includes things like whether the FTC regulates or other parts of the government subsidize Bitcoin since a big chunk of Tesla’s reported profits come from unrealized Bitcoin gains.
Do you know anything about Elon Musk’s companies?! He got to be the richest person in the world on the back of US tax payer via US federal loans, grants, and contracts[1]. If not for US tax dollars, his WikiPedia page would have ended with just another member of the PayPal Mafia and a young bald guy who crashed a MCClaren F1.
Also, if what you say is true then he surely won’t suggest that the US federal departments use X AI, right? Riiiiight????
People who are on the street or living in their car today.
We have a desperate need for affordable housing all over this country. SROs and hostel-style residences are perfectly reasonable as a step to keep people stable and off the streets.
Younger me. Lots of people. If you don't work from home it's just a crash pad. Saving a few hundred bucks a month is a good bargain for having to walk a few feet to pee.
It's not clear that this isn't the more cost-effective solution. Without diving into the pricing of each component shown, I suspect there may be some cost optimizations to make (for one example, I had a hard time discerning from the write-up what the EC2 instance was doing...something related to more weather data collection I think?) but this is approximately "cloud-native" in approach, and the way to minimize costs in the cloud is to design your application to be cloud-native and use managed services and provider-specific capabilities where they make sense (and also tend to offer very low/free per-use pricing). Does that increase vendor lock-in? Definitely. It's a trade-off that needs to be considered for each application. Using the cloud to run a bunch of static VMs is an anti-pattern and a big factor in driving costs through the roof. (If you need a single server, a VPS is a very good approach.)
The architecture is complex from the standpoint of having a lot of icons and arrows, but if it was running on a single server would it be _that_ much less complex? At this level of architectural diagram you probably condense most of these service icons down to one or two icons. But drill down further and you still have storage, cron jobs, an API endpoint with throttling/quota logic, CDN, a shared filesystem, the need to access the S3 buckets with weather data that AWS is providing from its Open Data Registry, plus (ideally) fine-grained permissions to lock everything down. Could you run all of this on a single server in a VPS? Yes! Could you run it on a vendor-agnostic K8s cluster? Yes! Would those options automatically be less expensive? Not necessarily.
[1] https://www.forbes.com/profile/elon-musk/