Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Fairburn's commentslogin

Someday, the US will be just a bubble where no other country gives their data to. We continue this decent into fascism to the point that nobody likes us.. or values us. Is this their idea of Utopia?


Unfortunately, yes. The American right has looked at Russia as a model for what they want America to be for some time.


Its what the US wants, and honestly at this point we should just completely cordon off the US from the rest of the world and give it to them.


Why don't you stop using American sites and services now then? I see comments like this a lot but no one wants to be personally inconvenienced to stop using hn/youtube/reddit/whatever.


>Why don't you stop using American sites and services now then?

So it is what you want.


I honestly don't care. I just push back on some of this rhetoric by challenging those who say this to actually practice what they preach.


It's what heritage foundation, elon and all the other billionaires want. This is not what most americans wanted, is it? How much of the population voted for orange man?


Are we winning yet?


Google shot it's shot with that alternative history artwork generation fiasco. Don't know why anyone would be too hot for them now. Dime a dozen at this point.


I think the number of people still holding a grudge for that today is small.


Early Claude was a weak simulation of Goody2.ai. Things change. Being a lover or hater of a model doesn’t make sense. It’s just tech. Run evals. Then use.


Nano Banana is one of the most used image gen models


Use anything BUT Chrome or Edge.


I've tried them all but nothing so far beats the UX of Chrome.


Genuinely curious what makes you say that. Haven't used Chrome for a really long time and not once I've missed it.


Nothing spectacular about it. Except for the obvious degradation of our planet, there isnt anything special about it. Its just our home.


Once Iran ramps up, its going to be a free-for-all against all US data infrastructure. Iran has friends in low places so they don't have to do all of the dirty work themselves. This should be a wake-up call.


Would be really cool if that book made its way to Youtube. Immortalize it.


Seems fairly immortal already, the book. It's the author who's having problems.


Religion = blind loyalty (to those in power of said religion)

It's one of the oldest tools we have to control society. And it gets abused. All. Of. The. Time.


That's better, but it's still wrong, because there are plenty of organized belief systems whose leaders don't demand blind loyalty. To say that these don't qualify as religions is absurd.

You could say that one of the elements of religion is having faith in something that is not provable via the scientific method and I'd agree. But then you'd lose generals, managers, politicians, etc... from the list above in which case the comment has lost its meaning.


I'd actually go a step further: even science and scientific method require a sort of "faith" that the underlying assumptions (axioms of formal logic and algebra at the very least) are true.

The core difference is that science invites questioning those unprovable assumptions, whereas religion usually does not (and sometimes forbids it as part of the canon).


"Do what we say or lose your income" does require blind faith in the correctness of the hierarchy. The business model and whether or not useful work is being done or if the biological is just shuffling capital around as political rules allow.

It requires ignoring management is just another random person, wielding fiat authority. Physics has not imbued them with special properties. It's allegiance to made up semantics.


> "Do what we say or lose your income" does require blind faith in the correctness of the hierarchy.

That just describes anyone who worked under management. Recognizing that you may be fired for disobeying orders != believing that your manager is physically special.

How do you define blind faith and informed faith? Can't you conceive of someone who follows orders without blindly believing in them?

You seem to have this caricature of an XSXJ in your mind but your definition is so broad it lumps the majority of the world into it, and that's what I'm calling you out on.


What obligation do I have to satisfy your sensibilities?

I have no obligation to contribute to your food or healthcare. Why care how you feel about my rhetoric?

You! Of all people! ...can "call me out" all you want.


better word is dogma


He would cry and cry


Flock is a terrorist organization. So there. Now what.


> Now what

Flock's terrorist cameras must be destroyed. With airstrikes and poisoned ice cream.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: