Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | OkWing99's commentslogin

So this is not different than people who share Google drive docs with company data with public links. It's not a fault of OpenAI or any other company. With enough time even your laptop can do it. How do they 'know' OpenAI breached? Maybe someone had an agent running asking to do a scan on any public docs?

Site is legit - https://www.tesla.com/careers/search/?department=terafab&sit...

I wouldn't be surprised if it's another Musk pump-and-dump scheme for SpaceX. We'll be seeing more of these every quarter now.


https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47969237

Posted 3 months ago as well, might not be new


I think 'model card' should be a 1 page summary of key info. The report format should be something like a 'model data sheet' (like safety data sheets that you get with chemicals). 98% of people would only want to know the key info, not read a whole report.


Dario Amodei is one of the authors of the paper. He used the same marketing tactic with Anthropic, and got flagged by US Gov.


Ask anything related to practical applications for quantum-computing, or space etc. The stuff you can find on Wikipedia.

They were able to solve coding, but not what a real danger is.


Some of it is a reference to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spider-Woman_(Gwen_Stacy)

(i.e. the porn references)


I used to have the CC $200 plan, and moved to Codex 6 months ago. I have the anthropic $20 plan + API billing for rare use. Use Codex daily.

Not having to deal with Anthropics constantly changing policies, token-gating, and carrot-and-stick marketing helps me to focus on work, rather than dealing with their company problems.


I think their goal is to merge Codex and ChatGPT usage.

Why did they break a perfectly working system.

Instead of keeping Codex work isolated, now I have to deal with other constant changing bloat.


Maybe they should try running Mythos to check Claude Code, given their marketing with it's superior performance.


So what happens to their $1T valuations now, given they can't sell the product to consumers, and open-weight models are closing in on competition?


I have a feeling that’s the same question Whitehouse asked Anthropic and OpenAI.


Yeah, it seems like this makes a massive cut into their possible revenue.


Ask SpaceX. There is no rational for those valuations, it’s pure FOMO


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: