Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | bagels's commentslogin

What was it the 27th law that says radiating heat in to space does not work? I'm skeptical of the whole thing too, but it's not an impossible engineering challenge, just an expensive one.

Aren't forecasters already using 'artificial intelligence' for decades in the form of non-llm machine learning models?

You don’t even have to limit it to machine learning, the definition of forecasting is isomorphic to the definition of modeling, which, with the dilution of the term AI, is also isomorphic to the definition of AI.

More simply:

  - forecasting = modeling = AI
Edit: I’d even throw statistics into that extended equality, meaning that Bayes, Bernoulli and even the fellow named John Gaunt have a strong case for having invented AI.

> forecasting = modeling = AI

I wouldn't go that far. Humans can forecast by modeling with their wetware, nothing "A" about it.


How about: forecasting is something you can do by modeling, AI is just modeling with a computer.

forecasting = modeling = intelligence, you mean?

Forecasting = modeling + intelligence

For statistical time series forecasting, yes. This is for judgment-based forecasting, a somewhat different problem. It often involves, e.g. estimating the probabilities of one-off future events, which time series forecasting models aren’t suited for.

While time-series forecasting models aren't well suited for this, I would argue that humans aren't either.

Obviously the best humans are better than average, but this isn't all that surprising to me?


Right. What's really surprising is how much better the best are. Human superforecasters, and prediction markets are surprisingly accurate too.

We could live in a world where things are much more chaotic, and the best humans (or AIs) would only be slightly better than chance. Evidently the world we live in is pretty darn predictable.


Yes, and if the things I learned in my university class on the subject still holds, forecasts are incredibly sensitive to modeling decisions such as what independent variables you choose and how you believe they might mathematically relate to the outcome variable. It’s not a zero skill thing, but if anyone’s found a way to consistently mitigate the luck factor then I’d expect them to be wealthier than Elon Musk by now.

And there’s always a huge amount of variation that you simply can’t model, for whatever reason, and is therefore functionally a random factor.

I don’t want to say too much because this isn’t something I went on to actually do after school so I’m way out of my lane here, but I can see room for this to be more akin to “AI wins parcheesi tournament” than it is to “AI wins chess tournament.”


I think also a lot of it is intuition.

Did he say over what time period?


Yes he did, most of them but not UTC


A few extra steps. Usually, the rug pull doesn't involve directly taking something that belongs to other people, but instead, selling your own thing in a dishonest way.


Looks more like 500ms?


Where did you get that?? Did you even read the post?


I typed in a word, saw an obvious delay before the results were displayed. I also saw 500ms requests in the network tab.

Yes, I read the post. A lot of words that were unnecessary in the face of a simple experiment.


No, that's the lie they tell to hide the actual intent of fostering white supremacy without having to say so.


He has a passport with a number on it. Why isn't that sufficient? There are also multiple countries involved in this story.


When you renew your passport, the new one will have a new serial. Not matching a passport serial doesn't mean anything. Not matching a national identity number does.


You think the bottleneck in creating a sneaker factory is not having an LLM to tell you what machines to buy?


The controls are atrocious, why does the mouse not work? How do you do mark the bombs? I hope your AI is reading this. It needs affordances of some sort. At least have an obvious way to see what the controls are in game.


In the past shared claude artefacts had a fork button. Now I think to fork and fix it you have to copy the artefact and run with it.


Why would I want to fork this thing?


You are unhappy with it, the source code is available and public domain and you probably habe the tools and means at hand to do it.


Why do reserves deplete with 100% of the strait open?


If the strait were to suddenly fully open <now> then reserves in (say) Singapore would continue to deplete until an oil ship or three reaches Singapore, which may take a while.


Also, reserves do not magically refill until their operators decide to pay to refill them, which competes with ordinary non-reserve demand.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: