Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jchanimal's commentslogin

Since removing a nation-state rootkit is not structurally possible, how is this any different from requiring the device to be forfeited? If all search == seizure and destruction, does that change the legal basis?

> Since removing a nation-state rootkit is not structurally possible,

on an iPhone, DFU-flash (using apple configurator) reads NO state from the phone and overwrites ALL state. Nowhere for rootkit to live. If you are worried, do that.


Yes, telling it that you want parsimonious solutions that reuse existing libraries makes a big difference. Why would it even try to do that sort of stuff if you didn’t ask?

Because it should be smart. I mean, why would a human coder ever observe standard best practices unless the client specifically asks them to?

Then run the annealer and learn from the result.

I wrote a tutorial about how you can import Strudel without embedding it. They publish JS modules so you can just import them and build an app around them: https://good.vibes.diy/blog/you-can-just-make-music


I don’t load any resources on my blog from other domains. I guess I could setup a subdomain to host strudel, that is a neat idea.


Since Fable, my legit infrastructure project has turned into the sort of thing I can do 95% on my phone. It’s reliable enough instead of doing big reviews, I’ve just been giving it smaller tasks, and dozens in parallel.

I created a skill that’s focused on getting PRs merge-ready, and now my attention is fully back where it should be, on deciding what changes will make the product better.

Our entire stack is Apache 2.0 open source, including the agent docs, so if you wanna try sitting at a higher level of abstraction, install the skill in your repo or just clone our whole project and start adding features: https://good.vibes.diy/blog/beast-mode-skill-for-claude-code


This reads like a paid testimonial.


If by that you mean I paid a lot to learn this. But at least I typed it with my own two hands.


I am glad! But you are indeed selling your own product here, correct?


This seems like a blog post with a link to a github repo. So I am not sure what product you are referring to.


The website linked is an utter mess. In design and performance.


The only reasonable solution shape I've seen is the one that trusts the parents to set an operating system setting that says whether or not the user is allowed to access adult content. And so it doesn't actually verify age, it just verifies parental intent.


I would not be opposed to that solution. If that's what we can get passed, I'd be happy.

Personally, I'm more in favor of a version that integrates with a government issued digital id that attests a user can legally see the provided material. The publisher would have to implement the check, because my version also includes the technical capability to disregard the law. You then just have to be ready to be charged with a crime.

I think the reason I prefer this is that my country almost already has the infrastructure for this system.


Thanks for sharing your perspective. It’s reminding me of how I was feeling about crypto in the early days. I begin specifying a project on those lines way back when and the ideas behind it are still interesting. Maybe you’ll enjoy: https://www.wired.com/2014/07/document-coin/


Wow yeah, the wired description of it really rings a lot of bells in my head. I've got a lot of design work in a very similar direction.

Did you ever get a chance to turn it into something worth sharing? I'd be interested in an account along the lines of: "here are the decisions I made at the time, and now, with a decade of hindsight here's the ones I like and the ones I'd change if I were to try again."

I found this: https://www.infoq.com/presentations/document-coin/ which I guess addresses the first part of my curiosity.


I am currently on a long laggy line on a resort island. Your timeout is too short, I’m sure it would work if it didn’t cut itself off.


The other half of the venn diagram you describe might be better understood as the manufactured normalcy field. Useful concept for product creators: https://www.urbanhonking.com/ideasfordozens/2012/06/24/desig...


The behavior at issue is not hostile, it’s a patriotic duty. We typically laude immigrants who assimilate, so why not in this case?


>it’s a patriotic duty.

For Americans, not foreigners.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: