Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | joecool1029's commentslogin

I'm wondering if caffeine was accounted for in this. One thing I seem to recall is peppermint tea has some inhibition of CYP1A2. I notice it's missing from the wikipedia page now, so maybe this was a flawed study or something... figured I'd mention in case anyone else knows.

At least this study says the activity was reduced, not significantly though: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S02786...


There were some higher profile products that left this out like the original revisions of the raspberry pi 4.


Raspberry Pi 4 had a slightly different problem - they attempted to get away with using just one resistor instead of two, as it allowed them to simplify their voltage-sensing circuit a bit. At a cost of non-compliance and all the issues that came with it, of course, so not a great bet after all.


So it wouldn't work on a pi then?


It would, but it would make the Pi not able to check the power capability of the source.

Note that the Pi's failure mode is different - it does work with C-to-C cables as long as they don't contain e-markers. They tried to be clever and it backfired.


>Don't most farmers own their own farms? (or work on a corporate monstrosity farm).

Why not both: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargill



still appears if you are in their testflight beta… weird

EDIT: apparently restored to appstore according to various sources.



Been moving all my domains to them for a couple years now. Happy so far with them and they handle some of the harder tld’s to find a registrar for.


It’s good. I packaged it in my gentoo overlay and have been using it for a couple months, none of the weird issues ntfs3 had.


> vaultwarden is great, but password managers are security critical software that need consistent maintenance and constant updates.

You’re acting like this isn’t the case already with vaultwarden? (and it’s easier to host as well, making for easier updates) https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/releases


Is it possible that you are assuming they are referring only to Vaultwarden itself? Half of the equation is a server component compatible with every app produced by a company, the other is every app that is produced by a company. If the company decides to stop being compatible (by changing their own communication), what are you left with besides the built-in web interface and a handful of “maybe-compatible, maybe-secure” apps?

Security updates aren’t just about the vault. What does having a fancy locking system mean if the moment you open the door everyone can just walk in?

Most people just want a product to do what it says from all their devices, and don’t care about any of this stuff. As such, they are more inclined to simply move to yet another least-friction mature ecosystem.

Vaultwarden as an alternative is a bit like suggesting a third-cousin who homebrews beer in a trash can knows a viable alternative as a nationwide replacement for Budweiser, because they both happen to use the same shape of bottles. I’m sure some family and friends might go along, but everyone else is just going to pick a new common brand that is similar to what they had, not start brewing their own beer. Some will…for a while.

The best thing about self-hosting your password vault is that you can be naive about how many times it has been compromised without detection.

(I’m not against self-hosting things — I’m against acting like it is a realistic alternative for average people who almost never have the skills to implement it securely.)


lighttpd still around too, on 1.4.82, not too much changed there.


They've been working on version 2.0 for many years now as well, I wonder when they think a release might happen.


To expand a little on this, Zelle and debit card transactions are covered under Regulation E: https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/100... . So there’s a codified procedure for disputes, it’s just a little less consumer friendly.


Patio11 has a fantastic writeup on exactly this: https://www.bitsaboutmoney.com/archive/regulation-e/


> There's Supreme Court precedent establishing that this isn't the case.

This? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Martinez-Fuer... or is there newer now?

> ACLU itself had backed off it, last I checked

They did, the current page greatly narrows the scope of their border-zone guidance to the SCOTUS case I linked before: https://www.aclu.org/know-your-rights/border-zone


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: