Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | m00x's commentslogin

I imagine he sold all of it by now

but Opus 5 is absolutely terrible. I'm still on 4.8 when I use Claude. I still think 5.6 Sol is the best available model outside of Astra/Fable.

Is Sol 6 terrible too?

It could be an internal model as well.

Could also just be hired specialists internally and it's pure marketing (even if they discovered something new).

lol, it's true, Claude in the article is so anthropomorphized that you could read it as if it was a human just as well.

I wonder if Google stole this code too like they did with minitap

The terminal gif is the most confusing slop I've seen from Google. It doesn't explain anything and it just seems to be a collection of random commands that someone ran to test, not something that tries to explain what the tool does.

I've driven busses and I was never trained not to do this. This falls under common sense.

(in my country, to get a bus driver license, you have to go through training that explain how to act in weird situation, how to identify dangers and which danger to prefer. You have a whole hour about always stopping at a safe place (parking, bus stop, red lignt, stop sign) before getting involved with anything that happen inside)

Maybe not common sense, but if you have a drivers license you should absolutely know it

In the US, in employment, there is no such thing as common sense. People come from diverse backgrounds. When you have a million employees, anything is possible as an untrained baseline. Everything has to be trained and accounted for.

The lawsuit isn't for chip designers, but the consumer product lines. It's possible they also got IP for chips, but that was not brought up.

How many ways can you convey doing the same thing? All the banks out there have almost identical slogans because they do very similar things.

uh oh. If my ELO gets back to my friends I'm going to be very embarrassed.

I closed my account before they find out and trace my moves.

They only did it because minitap called them out? It's in the post.

They were in clear violation of Apache 2.0


Obviously, and they deserve no credit for the bare minimum. But if you imagine them doing the opposite and not taking any steps to rectify the error, that would clearly be closer to a "coverup".


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: