Have you tried openrouters auto model? Tries to give you the best model based on prompt and price

https://openrouter.ai/docs/cookbook/coding-agents/openclaw-i...

That’s if you have disparate prompts and don’t want to actively select a model. If you’re developing a pipeline, it’s a terrible idea. You want to choose a model, validate it, then stick to it.

I have, but honestly that was exactly what I am not looking for. Sometimes it picked a model for a Dutch email that totally does not support Dutch. Other times it would work fine. It's just a layer of indeterminism I wasn't looking for.

They mention 5090 with regards to speed, Q6 will not have that speed?

And speed matters a lot for many use cases

150 tokens per second on a ternary model implies that it’s GPU bound, I’d bet a Q6 model is even faster because it’s existed longer and seen more optimization. You’d have to be insane to not run an NVFP4 quant over a ternary quant on Blackwell if they both fit.

With Ninfer and Qwen 3.8 27b it uses a groupwise int mixed quant, and it gets 160 tokens/sec. The mixed quant is between 4 and 6 bits.

Ninfer is compatible with a nvfp4 model for the 27b. Also nowadays I prefer to use the byteshape one, I get less loops, and I am not sure if I really see a difference in speed or quality. Pure vibe agentic coding on a C++ codebase or ocaml one, ocaml one has codex as reviewer as I am more interested by that project, the other is more for fun.

No, what you say is quite literally my argument; that the "Europe" is not the argument I value by itself for sovereignty

For satellites that should be in Sun-synchronous orbit Andøy is a great place to launch from

Would maybe call it European territory but not soil. But yeah, as you say it's how you define it.

Have been running self-hosted forgejo for a while now. Work's like a charm. Easy to use with LLM

Did you check out the statistics on the site? They listed 1233456, 12345, 1234,123 and 1 on the toplist of password.

If we are going to be clever we should follow the statistics and go for 12 that where not on the toplist!!

This is how it's planned in the EU is it not?

Maybe? I'm not sure since the UK is no longer part of the EU; we're running quite a bit behind on this kind of thing now.

AfAIK wero needs Google Play Integrity. So you are still stuck with Google.

When that are said. I 100% agree with you - one step at a time.

I think Wero will no longer depend on that in 3–5 years. It's just real challenges that the European banking system needs to figure out.

The EU works slow, but it does move :)

Kind of like the Ents in LOTR

> AfAIK wero needs Google Play Integrity. So you are still stuck with Google.

Wero has no such requirement. The bank that you use to interoperate with Wero might require Google Play Integrity though.

Thanks for the correction

Well 2 weeks ago I have managed to send and received a wero transaction from my /e/Os without Google play. Someone is wrong here

Wow. Interesting. Do you know how that was done?

The latest I heard about an alternative to Google play services was https://www.heise.de/en/news/Paying-without-Google-New-conso...

If you where able to send and receive I was obviously wrong. I'm very glad but also confused.

We have not used the wero app directly but my bank app which does not require Google play but has integrated the use of wero to send or receive money from or to bank accounts. My bank is LCL in France