Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Imagine thinking that AirPods were the first wireless headset.


The terminology "true wireless" became popular because of the wire linking the two sides on older bluetooth headsets.

When you think about it, the new usage (wireless = no wires at all) is more accurate than the old (wired, but not connected the the phone itself by wires)


Well technically, most others had a "wire" connecting left part to the right part :P


100% of the world calls those "wireless" not "wired":

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=wireless+headset&ia=images&iax=ima...

Every headset has some amount of wiring.


So they have wires but they are wireless...

Yet half of HN has a fit anytime the word “Serverless” is uttered.


Imagine thinking the AirPods are a "headset."



In my environment we tend to call "Headset" something that is set up for quality conversations (think gaming or office headsets - large earmuffs and microphone boom being defining quality) and "Headphones" things that are intended primarily for consuming/listening (which may incidentally have a microphone, typically inferior).

Understanding that may not be wider usage, I feel there exists a need (or at least benefit) for two words - something which is good/intended for listening, and something which is good/intended for conversing.


AirPods are intended (and great) for talking


They are absolutely great... for person with the AirPods. For the rest of the poor suckers on the call, it's headache time.

As I'm currently in operations, vast majority of my team spends 4+++ hrs a day on calls and conference calls. We'll take a $20 3.5mm Logitech with a boom over a $100 bluetooth with a boom over $200 bluetooth without a boom in a heart beat. Anybody with airpods [or Samsung etc equivalents] has been taken out to the back alley and shot by now.


When did I say or imply that?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: