Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

A somewhat pragmatic definition of seniority:

The more senior you are, the more damage you get to do to the business if you're wrong. Intern working on a file format? Somebody else can redo the work if you screw up. CTO setting development strategy? Tank the whole product development effort, hobbling even good developers.

I consider a senior engineer to be (in broad strokes):

- Somebody who can organize other engineers to accomplish an objective.

- Somebody who can pinch hit if needed on any projects under their direction.

- Somebody who actively teachers other engineers about what the engineer knows, inside of work or out.

- Somebody who has either fucked up a few times, or salvaged a fucked-up situation (business or development), and can explain what happened, what their role in it was, and how they should've done things differently (because there's always a better set of actions to take).

- Somebody who can interface directly with customers if needed and who can help compromise between business objectives and engineering ones--even if it means saying no to new shiny or sugardadddy customer.

EDIT:

It's very important not to confuse a domain expert with a senior engineer. I've worked with brilliant DBAs and syadmins and OOP folks, and they're much better in their fields than I am--but that doesn't make them suited for architecture and project work.



I think this is a very good definition for what a senior engineer should be.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: